Dramatic stories of natural catastrophes fill newsfeeds almost
daily. Earthquakes, floods, fires, hail storms, tornados, and hurricanes
dominate headlines, reminding us that humans hold little power over weather and
geological activities. Discussion of
recent events led to an emotional discussion during art class the other day.
Eventually our group wondered how people who lived here before us handled such
phenomena when they occurred during their lives?
Depending on how far back we’re talking, we agreed that many
of those individuals lived migratory lifestyles. It made me think about what I
know about native people of the Great Plains. Using human, horse, and dog power, they
transported tanned hides and wooden supports used to construct temporary homes with
them as they followed wildlife herds. These creatures provided not only food,
but also materials used to construct homes, tools, bedding, and clothing. Their
Walmart had hooves.
The nature of these transient beasts meant they constantly
moved, seeking grasses that thrived across this region from Texas to Canada.
Herds large enough to darken the plains for miles quickly devoured this solar
generated calorie resource. When the grass was gnawed to the ground, they moved
shifted locale, leaving it to regrow before their next pass through the area.
As a result, humans whose lives depended on the great, shaggy beasts packed up
and trekked after them.
While some imagine the hardships of such a life, researchers
tell us it was beneficial. Food was fresh, and tribes usually abandoned camp
long before human wastes fouled water and soil that sustained them. As part of
nature’s cycles, they understood the waxing and waning of the moon as well as
the always changing seasons. They knew where their food and resources came from
and how to preserve them for later use. They were more in touch with the realities
of existence than modern urban dwellers.
Like us, they were susceptible to natural disasters. Oral
histories and records kept on animal skins reveal accounts of apocalyptic
events. The difference is that their mobility encouraged a high degree of
adaptability. Reconstructing a hide tipi required resources and labor, but it
didn’t require a lifelong mortgage to replace it. Because they moved where game
moved, fire meant a lost season of grass in one locale, not a lost herd that
had to be rebuilt--if finances permitted.
When such events occurred, whole tribes moved on, lending
support to the weakest in the group. They maintained their cyclical behaviors
until cultural conflict made that impossible. Equivalent catastrophes today
often isolate individuals or families who then depend on strangers or
impersonal government entities to help them rebuild lives. Not only do people
lose homes and possessions, businesses, farms, vineyards, and ranches succumb
to raging floods and flames. Lifetime dreams vanish overnight.
While technology and civilization provide temperature
controlled climates inside four walls, it’s worth considering what modern humans
give up to enjoy such comfort. Unless we consciously contemplate our
relationship with nature and its pros and cons, it’s easy to think we’re the
masters of the universe. That is until a natural disaster reminds us we aren’t
in control of anything but how we respond to what happens to us.
No comments:
Post a Comment