If you tune into the news, you’ll see people and nations
disputing boundaries. These disagreements may involve guns, artillery, and
bombs, or they may be legal wars that wind their way through courtrooms for
years before anyone gets a definitive answer regarding who owns what. Since the
beginning of time, humans have wrangled over property lines. After watching two
male cardinals duke it out last week, I’ve decided people ought to settle their
differences the way birds do—with song.
As a kid, I thought birds sang because they were happy. When
I grew up, I learned they generally sing to attract mates or to establish and
defend territory. Scientists who study such behaviors can tell you exactly how
many tunes an individual species sings. According to one observer, brown
thrashers produce 2,000 different songs while the Henslow sparrow has a
repertoire of only one. That’s a lot of watching and recording to determine
what’s going on in the bird world.
In North America, we hear mostly male birds because they typically
initiate courting behavior and establish or defend territory. Researchers discovered
that playing a recording of another male house wren’s song triggers hostile
behavior in listening wrens. They also know that if they remove these guys from
their native habitat and play recorded territorial songs, a transplanted bird rarely
invades the new region. The other fella’s melody establishes clear boundaries
without bloodshed or violence.
Recently, I saw this in action. While rambling about town, I
heard competing cardinals calling back and forth across a street. I’ve wanted to
photograph these scarlet beauties so I stopped to look for the source of the
racket. One chap hid among the leaves of a tall tree while his opponent clung
defiantly to a wire strung between telephone poles as they hurled insults back
and forth.
As I watched, their volume increased. If bird body language
is anything like that of humans, the creature on the line was agitated. He
wanted that other guy GONE. I observed their trilling for five minutes until I
realized their duel could go on all day. I returned the next morning to see if
the warbling warriors were still sparring, but silence reigned over the neighborhood.
The feud ended without a single casualty.
While I finished that morning stroll, I had much to
consider. What if humans sorted out their differences through song? Would folks
like me who can’t carry a tune but possess a loud voice have an advantage? Would
others give in to shut us up? Maybe the contest would be like TV shows where celebrities
declare a winner.
In the human world, I’m sure a third party would settle the
issue, but I’m uncertain whether scientists know how birds determine a victor.
They only know that birds select mates and settle territorial conflicts through
song.
It makes me wonder what John Lennon thought about as he
wrote these lyrics, “There’s nothing to kill or die for” in his song “Imagine.”
Perhaps he too watched birds settle differences by trilling memorable tunes and
imagined settling disputes without violence.
No comments:
Post a Comment