Over a
decade ago, I lucked into a National Endowment for the Humanities Seminar
titled The Great Plains: Texas to
Saskatchewan. For five weeks, Tom
Isern led 19 other teachers and I to read
and analyze literary and historical texts, discuss conclusions, and visit
iconic sites to better understand what it means to live on the plains.
One
identifying characteristic of this land is its vast horizon paired with few vertical disturbances like trees or
skyscrapers. That distinction made it
into plenty of diaries and journals as pioneers left locales where coves and
hollows or great groves of trees cupped around them, making them feel secure as
a babe in its mother’s arms. When my mom worked at the Meade County Courthouse
back in the 60s, she discovered records of early immigrants institutionalized when
they were unable to cope with the open t space and frequent wind.
Fellow
seminarians from other regions shared that the immensity of our vistas
disquieted them as well. That reminded
me of a Japanese exchange student I took on a visit to Oklahoma City. She exclaimed over and over , “Why don’t you
build cities in this land? Why don’t
people live here? You should use this space.”
For those of
us accustomed to so much sky and so few upright interferences, outsiders’
viewpoints challenge us to think about where we live and what it means to be a
plains person. Recently, I’ve traveled
the more isolated highways of western Kansas, stopping to explore almost-ghost
towns like Densmore, Ogallah, and Edson that were once thriving communities.
I love isolated miles of asphalt stretching
infinitely over hills and valleys. I
smile to think how these trails must confuse
anyone who thinks all of Kansas is flat.
High spots abound that permit travelers to see across counties. Imagine Indians and other early explorers standing
on these ascents to view scores of buffalo, deer, elk, turkey, and
antelope. In all directions, they saw a
rich land that could feed many.
Seeing crumbling remains of once well-built churches,
multi-story brick or stone schools, plaster and lathe homes that housed growing
families, and the always peaceful hilltop cemeteries reminds me that hopeful
hearts once acted on the thought that this is an abundant land. These little
hamlets about every 15 to 20 miles across the prairie remind us of Jeffersonian
Democracy in action. Here families
worked the soil, tended their businesses, worshipped their God, and educated
their children into a better life.
As folks
gravitated away from these self-sufficient little villages to cities, they lost
something. These small towns tied to the
land, these schools that required all students to participate in declamations,
plays, music, and sports; these churches that took care of not only spirits but
also physical needs of residents created well-rounded citizens who dealt
together with whatever difficulties arose.
In forested
regions, close-growing trees hold one another upright when the wind blows, and in
mountainous landscapes one rock supports another. Nature offers no protection in
the open plains, so humans must sustain one
another. Neighbors become one another’s rock,
cove, hollow, and grove.
When I think
back to that seminar and this place I call home, I acknowledge that
lifestyles change. We can’t all live in self-sufficient
villages, but we can celebrate open space that reminds us this is a rich land
that feeds many and a place that teaches us to look out for one another.
No comments:
Post a Comment